![]() Meanwhile, the Chronomaster has a perpetual calendar, which fits that "I never want to touch my crown" HAQ ethos. In no particular order, my thoughts.įunctionality: The GS GMT hand is really cool, but all I really want is easy hour adjustment, which both models have. Maybe it's obvious why my choices have narrowed to Citizen vs. That’s over five times more precise than international standards require.So I'm in the market for a rest-of-my-life quartz dress watch. Why are we referencing all these numbers? Because Citizen’s Chronomaster timepieces are accurate to ±5 seconds a year. While the typical quartz timepiece maintains a ☑ second a day average and good quartz timepieces make ☑5 seconds a month, by COSC standards, a quartz chronometer holds a requirement of ☒5.55 seconds a year. Some quick numbers to note: according to the Contrôle Officiel Suisse des Chronomètres (COSC), mechanical tickers are considered to be highly precise when they maintain a rate of −4/+6 seconds per day. As a result, high-precision quartz timekeeping is making a strong comeback. This redefinition is in no small part due to the presence of smartwatches, which are driving forward digital timekeeping efforts. In recent days, however, there’s been increasing interest in redefining electronically assisted timekeeping – quartz-powered timekeepers are no longer simply the more accessible option. ![]() At Revolution, we’ll be honest in saying that we’re a tad biased towards mechanical watchmaking. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |